Close

Governance Banking Financial Services Class Action Collective Redress Commercial Litigation Funding Group Litigation Investor Loss Securities Claim Shareholder Dispute

Commonwealth Bank of Australia

The Case

Therium is funding a class action on behalf of shareholders of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd. The shareholders’ case alleges breaches by the Bank between 2014 and 2017 of its continuous disclosure obligations, primarily relating to alleged breaches of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006. In a case brought against the Bank by an Australian regulator, the Bank admitted to these breaches and agreed to pay a AUS $700m penalty.

Why It’s Significant

Therium’s class action is running alongside another class action brought against the Bank, with both law firms acting on a co-operative basis. The combined class actions have been brought on behalf of a large number of domestic and international financial institutions who have suffered significant losses.

Therium’s Solution

The case is a good example of well-resourced financial institutions using litigation finance in preference to their own capital in order to vindicate their legal rights and recover their losses.

Specialism

Class Action / Group Litigation / Regulatory /  Securities  Litigation / Investor Loss / Shareholder Dispute / Collective Redress

Sector

Financial Services / Banking

Case Studies

Banking Financial Services Anti-trust / Competition Class Action Collective Redress Investor Loss

FX Cartel

The Case

Therium funded a potential opt-out collective proceeding before the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) brought by economist Michael O’Higgins against five global investment banks, each of which was found by the European Commission to have operated illegal foreign exchange spot trading cartels over a period of five years. The claim seeks damages of more than £1bn resulting from what has been widely described as the “Forex Cartels”

Why It’s Significant

The matter is significant because of the scale of impact of the FX Cartel. The case is notable as the first claim in the CAT being brought on an opt-out basis for claimants other than consumers and the first where there are two competing opt-out class cases.

Therium’s Solution

Therium is co-funding with another litigation funder and its group is expected to be the largest in the claim.

Specialism

Anti-Trust / Competition / Class Action / Collective Redress / Investor Loss

Sector

Financial Services / Banking

Case Studies

Banking Financial Services Breach of Contract

Swaps Litigation

The Case

Therium funded the claimant company’s claim against a major bank arising out of the claimant’s purchase of an interest-rate hedging product from the bank.

Why It’s Significant

The claimant was treated as a ‘sophisticated borrower’ for the purpose of the relevant banking standards such that the case centred on broader allegations of LIBOR manipulation by the bank and its consequences for the product purchased by the claimant.

Therium’s Solution

Whilst the claimant was sufficiently liquid to have funded the proceedings itself, it chose to utilise litigation funding to lay off the litigation risk.

The case settled on favourable terms to the claimant.

Specialism

Breach of Contract

Sector

Financial Services / Banking

Meet The TeamThe Team

Case Studies

Banking Financial Services Retail Anti-trust / Competition Class Action Collective Redress Group Litigation

Interchange Litigation

The Case

The Interchange litigation involves claims by merchants – typically retailers, hotel groups and others – against Mastercard and Visa for damages arising out of interchange fees charged by the card schemes contrary to UK and European competition law.

stack of multicolored credit cards on black background

Why It’s Significant

The UK claims involve hundreds of businesses, including leading retail groups, with claims amounting to billions of pounds. The litigation is a notable example of group litigation being run in the Competition Appeal Tribunal where claims are being managed together but without a Collective Proceedings Order.

Therium’s Solution

Therium is backing a wide cross-section of claimants including well-resourced corporate clients who benefit by using litigation finance in place of their own resources in order to pursue the claim.

Specialism

Group Litigation / Class Action / Collective redress / Anti-Trust / Competition

Sector

Financial Services / Retail

Case Studies