Why It’s Significant
The case has particular significance as being one of the first to test the CPR 19.6 ‘representative claimant’ regime following the clarification of the rules by the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google.
The claim shows Therium’s innovative approach in funding cases at the cutting edge of collective redress.
The funding also typifies Therium’s commitment to backing meritorious claims in circumstances where the claimants might otherwise be denied access to justice.
Class Action / Group Litigation / Breach of Fiduciary Duty / Bribery / Collective Redress