The case involves a multi-million USD treaty claim against a Latin American State under a Bilateral Investment Treaty for unlawful seizure of assets belonging to the claimant.
The wrongful actions of the State have been the subject of parallel proceedings and caused substantial losses to the client.
Therium’s funding has provided the means by which the client can seek redress for the losses it has suffered which would not be possible without external financing.
International Arbitration / Bilateral Investment Treaty
Shipping
You may unsubscribe at any time. View our privacy policy
An investor-state claim against an African state arising out of the breach of an infrastructure contract.
Therium backed the claim despite some market concerns about the identity of the respondent – state.
Therium also structured the funding arrangements to afford the claimant ample opportunity to settle for a discount on the substantive funding terms.
International Arbitration / BIT Arbitration
Infrastructure
You may unsubscribe at any time. View our privacy policy
An investor-state claim arising from expropriation of the claimant’s investment in a port facility. During the course of the proceedings, the respondent brought collateral proceedings in the U.S. in an attempt to frustrate the main action.
Facilitating access to justice for an impecunious claimant against a respondent state, where no local remedy existed.
Therium’s funding enabled the claimant’s lawyers to successfully resist the US proceeding and ensure the continuation of the treaty claim.
International Arbitration / BIT Arbitration
Infrastructure
You may unsubscribe at any time. View our privacy policy
